Debt Limit Deal Sets Up Stagnant Funding for Science

Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) speaks with reporters about negotiations to lift the federal debt limit.
(Image credit – Office of Speaker McCarthy)
Republicans and Democrats are lining up votes
Since most science programs are funded through discretionary spending, the agreement means any increases they receive will generally have to be paid for with cuts elsewhere. For that reason, appropriations likely will fall well behind the budget targets set out
The agreement does not affect the multiyear funding already appropriated through the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the Inflation Reduction Act, and the semiconductor provisions of the CHIPS and Science Act.
Biden administration officials are arguing that the outcome is probably similar to what Republicans and Democrats would have negotiated to finalize fiscal year 2024 appropriations later this year. Notably, the two years of caps set by the agreement are much less than the decade of caps put in place following a debt-limit standoff early in the Obama administration, meaning the next presidential election will have more direct implications for the future direction of spending than the 2012 election did.
In the near term, the agreement means appropriators will have firm guidelines to follow when formulating their fiscal year 2024 spending proposals, and the drafts they release in the coming weeks will give a stronger indication of final outcomes than those released during the past two budget cycles, for which spending limits were not agreed on until late in negotiations.
Because disagreements on overarching spending levels are typically among the main impediments to finalizing spending legislation, the agreement may also expedite enactment of fiscal year 2024 budgets.