
Image credit – Adam Schultz / The White House
Image credit – Adam Schultz / The White House
President Biden’s budget request for fiscal year 2024 seeks increases across most science agencies and retains his prior requests’ emphasis on research related to emerging technologies and climate change. It also prioritizes major initiatives such as the National Science Foundation’s Directorate for Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships
However, the budget’s ambitions also fall short of those set out in last year’s CHIPS and Science Act
The administration’s proposals face a highly uncertain political dynamic in Congress as this is the first request since the Democrats lost control of the House. Although Biden’s previous appropriations have required Republican buy-in to clear the threat of a Senate filibuster, House Republicans will be newly empowered to press their agenda to reduce non-defense spending. The year’s budget negotiations have only begun to play out, but the political headwinds pushing against funding increases are likely to be strong.
Summary figures from the request will be compiled in FYI’s Federal Science Budget Tracker
The administration aims to raise the budget for the Office of Science by 9% to $8.8 billion. Among the office’s programs, the largest proposed increase by a wide margin is for Fusion Energy Sciences, backing up the “bold decadal vision”
The administration continues to seek sizeable increases for selected energy R&D activities, including a 38% boost for the Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy that would bring its budget to $650 million. Proposals for renewable energy include an 83% increase to $216 million for geothermal energy and a nearly tripled budget of $385 million for wind energy, dedicated mostly to two initiatives in offshore power generation. A cut for the Office of Nuclear Energy is accounted for largely by the ramp down of a project focused on small modular reactors. The administration seeks $35 million for planning an “18th national laboratory” that would be sited at a Historically Black College or University or another minority-serving institution and would conduct multidisciplinary research on regional and local energy issues. Large-scale demonstration projects will continue to be separately funded through special multiyear appropriations
NSF’s budget would increase about 15% to $11.3 billion, building on the 12% increase Congress provided last year through a $1 billion supplementary appropriation. The recently created
In the previous appropriations cycle, Congress boosted NIST’s budget by 32% to $1.63 billion, though about half the increase was for earmarked construction and research projects at universities that are tangential to the agency’s mission. The administration now seeks to increase the budget for NIST’s core activities excluding earmarks up to $1.63 billion, which is close to the target set in the CHIPS and Science Act. Top priorities for NIST include expanding its manufacturing programs as well as addressing a severe maintenance and recapitalization backlog at its campuses in Colorado and Maryland. While the administration proposes doubling NIST’s facilities maintenance budget to $262 million, NIST has estimated
A proposed 6% increase for the Science Mission Directorate would bring its budget to almost $8.3 billion, with the largest increases directed to the Earth Science and Planetary Science Divisions. Within Planetary Science, $949 million is requested for the Mars Sample Return mission, far outstripping the annual budget for any other individual project the directorate is supporting. NASA warns that MSR cost estimates are escalating and it anticipates having either to descope the mission or divert funding from other efforts. After funding was diverted last year from the Near-Earth Object Surveyor, that mission’s annual budget is now poised to reach higher levels than previously anticipated to accommodate its own cost increase. As a new cost-controlling measure, the administration proposes cutting the Heliophysics Division budget by 7% to $751 million, primarily by pausing work on the Geospace Dynamics Constellation, a major mission to study the Earth’s upper atmosphere that is just starting to ramp up.
The NNSA budget would increase 8% to $23.8 billion, with its Stockpile Research, Technology, and Engineering portfolio also rising 8% to just under $3.2 billion. Within that amount, the administration proposes to cut the Inertial Confinement Fusion program by 5% to $602 million, broadly attributing the move to “reprioritization of resources to support higher priority NNSA programmatic efforts.” However, the administration does anticipate ramping up funding for fusion in future fiscal years. Further, the historic achievement
The administration proposes to increase funding for DOD’s Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation accounts by 2% to $147 billion. That would continue a trend that has already more than doubled funding for RDT&E since the beginning of the Trump administration. However, the relatively small percentage-wise increase would entail cuts to earlier-stage R&D accounts, including a 15% cut bringing basic research funding down to $2.5 billion, close to its fiscal year 2019 level. The annual budget for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency would increase 8% to $4.39 billion under the request.
NOAA’s budget would increase 10% to $6.8 billion under the request. The administration states
Echoing its ambitious proposals for the previous two years, the administration seeks a 19% increase to $1.79 billion for USGS. Additional funding would both expand existing programs and establish new initiatives, particularly surrounding research on the emission and absorption of greenhouse gases and the impacts of climate change.
Within NIH, the budget for ARPA–H would jump 66% to $2.5 billion, while the budget for the rest of NIH would increase only about 2% to $48.6 billion, with many of its institutes and centers slated for flat funding. The administration requests a special multiyear $20 billion appropriation for a pandemic preparedness and biodefense initiative, of which NIH would receive $2.7 billion. The administration proposed a similarly ambitious preparedness initiative last year that Congress declined to fund.