
Mark Menezes, left, and Paul Dabbar, the nominees for two key under secretary positions at the Department of Energy, testify at their July 20 confirmation hearing.
(Image credit – Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee)
Mark Menezes, left, and Paul Dabbar, the nominees for two key under secretary positions at the Department of Energy, testify at their July 20 confirmation hearing.
(Image credit – Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee)
On July 20, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee held a hearing
At present, the position for which Dabbar has been nominated oversees both DOE’s Office of Science and its applied energy offices, such as the Office of Nuclear Energy and the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. However, DOE has indicated to both nominees that it plans to revert to an earlier structure. This could mean it will transfer responsibility for the applied energy offices to the position for which Menezes has been nominated. Such a realignment would significantly alter how DOE currently coordinates its R&D programs across the department.
At the hearing, both Dabbar and Menezes cited their extensive experience in energy sector finance as their primary qualification to hold senior managerial roles at DOE.
Dabbar is currently head of energy mergers and acquisitions at J.P. Morgan. In his testimony
He also expressed his enthusiasm for recent advances in research, saying, “In the area of fundamental science, opportunities exist for significant leaps in machine learning and artificial intelligence, as well as exascale computing and quantum information science.”
Holding a degree in marine engineering from the U.S. Naval Academy, Dabbar began his career as an officer aboard a nuclear submarine. He has also conducted research at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. More recently, he has served as a member of DOE’s Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB).
Menezes is currently vice president of federal relations at Berkshire Hathaway Energy, an investment firm, and has previously worked as an attorney in the energy sector. He also served as chief counsel of the House Energy and Commerce Committee during the period when the Energy Policy Act of 2005 was enacted. In his testimony
While both Dabbar and Menezes said they expect a reorganization of their prospective positions at DOE, they testified that they had not been apprised of what the exact bounds of their responsibilities will be. In particular, neither indicated which of them would have jurisdiction over DOE’s applied energy offices, which have a combined budget of over $4 billion.
Both the under secretary positions were established in statute
From 2006 to 2009, Raymond Orbach served as both under secretary for science and as director of the Office of Science. However, Orbach’s successor as under secretary, Steve Koonin, served only in that role and reportedly became frustrated with the position’s vaguely defined authorities prior to his resignation
Meanwhile, up to 2013, the other under secretary position — often referred to as “under secretary for energy and environment” — had authority over the applied energy offices as well as DOE’s extensive environmental cleanup efforts. Since 2013, it has been called the “under secretary of management and performance,” and has continued to oversee environmental activities.
Menezes said at the hearing that it is his understanding that “on day one” he would assume the responsibilities currently assigned to the management and performance position. He also noted, though, that in the history of the position “it’s the current organizational nomenclature that’s the anomaly.”
The anticipated reorganization at the under secretary level comes as the Trump administration is proposing to limit the department’s efforts in applied research and technology commercialization. In their written
Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) asked both nominees about what they would do to not “pick winners and losers in the energy sector.” Menezes replied that his work at Berkshire Hathaway is not about picking winners but rather involves developing “projects where you can [in order] to provide affordable, reliable service.”
In his response, Dabbar said he intends to execute faithfully whatever policies Congress establishes through its appropriations, remarking,
Obviously the administration focuses on basic research and there’s obviously a tremendous amount of basic research opportunities within my potential area. I will execute … on whatever [appropriation] is assigned and I will make sure that that capital, whether it’s in basic or applied, will be spent prudently.
Orr also emphasized the under secretary’s role in developing and driving forward DOE’s “crosscutting initiatives” in areas such as grid modernization and exascale computing. He said the under secretary plays a key role in drawing proposals from DOE’s “big ideas summits” and implementing them in new DOE programs. The objective, he said, was to identify and foster collaborative possibilities that would be “more than the sum of the parts.”
Exactly how DOE reconfigures Dabbar’s and Menezes’s positions, and how they operate in those positions, will be elemental to how the department coordinates its R&D efforts moving forward.
The timeline for any change remains uncertain. The Energy and Natural Resources Committee has postponed until further notice a vote originally scheduled for July 27 to advance all six nominations under consideration to the full Senate, and August recess is approaching. The Washington Examiner reports
DOE’s third under secretary position, the under secretary for nuclear security, is also the administrator of the National Nuclear Security Administration. That position remains occupied by Frank Klotz and it is not expected to undergo any restructuring.