
President Trump addresses an audience at the Pentagon during an event marking the release of the Missile Defense Review.
(Image credit – White House / Joyce Boghosian)
President Trump addresses an audience at the Pentagon during an event marking the release of the Missile Defense Review.
(Image credit – White House / Joyce Boghosian)
Last week, the Department of Defense released its long-awaited Missile Defense Review
President Trump and Vice President Pence both spoke
In the fiscal year 2018 National Defense Authorization Act
At a press briefing
Currently, DOD has in place a system called Space Based Infrared Surveillance (SBIRS) comprising satellites in geosynchronous and highly elliptical orbits that can detect the bright infrared signatures of ballistic missiles. The department has also previously considered a complementary constellation that would operate in low Earth orbit called the Precision Tracking Space System. However, a 2012 National Academies report
The MDR renews the justification for space-based sensor systems in part by stating they could provide distinct advantages for detecting and tracking the new hypersonic weapons that nations such as China and Russia are developing. It explains, “The wider view from space allows for improved tracking and potentially targeting of advanced threats such as [hypersonic glide vehicles], which fly at lower altitudes than ballistic missiles and can maneuver throughout their trajectories to avoid some radar coverages.”
At the press briefing, Mike Griffin, the under secretary of defense for research and engineering, elaborated that DOD now believes the “best approach is a network of satellites in low orbit — how many, what orbit, all to be determined.” He explained that hypersonic vehicles are “dimmer targets” that require sensors to be closer to the Earth than the current SBIRS system. Addressing the new sensor network’s anticipated cost, Griffin said he believes it will be “comparable to other existing assets today that we already have in the fleet,” adding, “It’s not some outlandish number.”
The MDR indicates that DOD also plans to move ahead with assessing the feasibility and cost of other, more speculative anti-missile technologies.
The review states that DOD’s Missile Defense Agency will produce a report within six months on space-based ballistic missile interceptor systems that “will identify the most promising technologies, and estimated schedule, cost, and personnel requirements for a possible space-based defensive layer that achieves an early operational capability for boost-phase defense.” The report will inform future decisions on whether to pursue such a system. In addition, the MDR indicates DOD will conduct a broader “examination” of potential interceptor systems that could include experiments and demonstrations in space.
Space-based interceptors have been a subject of considerable controversy since they were first considered by President Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative. They are intended to launch from orbit to intercept and destroy ballistic missiles during their “boost phase,” meaning the first few minutes following launch. Opponents claim
Explaining the department’s renewed interest in the technology, the MDR states, “Much has changed since the United States last considered space-based interceptors in a potential architecture, including major improvements in technologies applicable to space-basing and directed energy.” It also cites the “rapid advancement and diffusion of offensive missile threats and technology,” as well as the directions provided in the fiscal year 2018 NDAA.
The MDR indicates that DOD will also explore other technologies for defeating ballistic missiles during their boost phase, including “compact high energy laser technology” that is designed to be carried on an “airborne platform,” such as an unmanned drone. The review says such a system would build on advances already made on beam propagation and control in the department’s Airborne Laser Program, as well as on the MDA’s ongoing program to develop a Low-Power Laser Demonstrator
Addressing directed energy weapons in general, the MDR states that DOD is currently developing a strategic roadmap for the technologies that will inform the upcoming budget request and satisfy a requirement in the fiscal year 2017 NDAA
The U.S. Air Force’s Airborne Laser Test Bed makes its final takeoff from Edwards Air Force Base on Feb. 14, 2012. The aircraft was used to test the use of directed energy technologies against ballistic missile threats.
(Image credit – Missile Defense Agency)
The MDR’s emphasis on not committing to specific technologies is consistent with DOD’s recent focus on using prototyping and testing to better inform its development and acquisition programs.
The review states that tests provide data to “demonstrate the operational effectiveness, suitability, survivability, and security” of ballistic missile defense system elements. It continues, “Even tests that are not fully successful may be useful by providing valuable information to assess the performance of the system. We must not fear test failure, but learn from it and rapidly adjust.”
At the press briefing, Griffin echoed that sentiment, remarking, “We are confident that the technologies outlined in the report are technologies we want to investigate, with experiments and prototypes and tests — and I’ll emphasize again, tests — to see how well they work.”
Missile Defense Agency Director Lt. Gen. Sam Greaves agreed, adding,
One of the most important takeaways from the Missile Defense Review is the fact that we will be executing a disciplined acquisition process for everything. … Prove things in the laboratory, prove things on the ground, maybe go to air, maybe go to space if that’s where it ends up. But the most important thing for us and within this administration and the Hill is that you won’t see us jumping to the objective system immediately.