|
What’s Ahead
|
This year’s Capitol Christmas Tree arrived on Nov. 19. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) is aiming to complete work on Democrats’ top legislative priority, the Build Back Better Act, by the time lawmakers leave for the holiday. (Image credit – Architect of the Capitol) |
Senate Revising Build Back Better Act
As the year winds down, the Senate is continuing to press ahead with the Build Back Better Act, Democrats’ nearly $2 trillion spending bill. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has said he hopes to complete work on it by Christmas, though some senators expect a final vote may end up being pushed to next year. Last week, Senate Democrats released text for portions of the bill alongside new estimates of their fiscal impacts from the Congressional Budget Office. The House passed its version of the bill, which includes more than $10 billion for R&D and related infrastructure, on an essentially party-line vote on Nov. 19. The Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee’s spending proposals for science agencies are identical to the House bill’s, allocating $3.5 billion for the National Science Foundation, $1.25 billion for the National Institute of Standards and Technology, $1.1 billion for NASA, and $859 million for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The House and Senate versions would also both create new tax credits for public university research infrastructure projects and semiconductor manufacturing facilities and would delay by four years a provision from the 2017 tax law overhaul that weakened the R&D tax credit. The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee has not yet released its portion of the bill, which covers Department of Energy science and technology programs. Committee Chair Joe Manchin (D-WV) has been one of the key holdouts on the legislation and continued to express concerns about its impacts and costs last week.
Annual Defense Policy Update Rounding Final Corner
The Senate is poised to pass the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 this week, sending it to President Biden for his signature. The House already passed the bill last week on a vote of 363 to 70 after House and Senate lawmakers finished harmonizing their respective versions at the end of the previous week. The finalized version is expected to clear the chamber with strong bipartisan support after lawmakers reached an agreement to pass it separately from a politically volatile measure that raises the statutory ceiling on the national debt. Provisions in the final bill include the creation of a “National Security Commission on Emerging Biotechnology” and another commission to recommend reforms to the Department of Defense’s planning and budgeting framework, which has been blamed for constraining DOD’s ability to manage technology projects flexibly. All research security proposals for the bill were dropped, though those provisions could be incorporated with related ones being considered for Congress’ pending R&D and national competitiveness legislation. A proposal to lay groundwork for a “Minority Institute for Defense Research” was watered down to a requirement that DOD develop a plan to “promote defense-related engineering, research, and development activities at minority institutions.”
Top Administration Officials Appearing at Annual AGU Meeting
Trial of Harvard Chemist Latest Test of DOJ China Initiative
On Tuesday, the trial of Harvard chemist Charles Lieber is beginning in Massachusetts. Lieber was indicted by the Department of Justice in January 2020 for allegedly lying to federal investigators about his participation in a Chinese talent recruitment program and for failing to disclose his income from China to the IRS. The indictment claims that under a contract with the Wuhan University of Technology, Lieber was paid $50,000 per month, plus living expenses, as well as about $1.5 million to establish a lab in China. The case is among the highest-profile DOJ is pursuing through its China Initiative, and the second involving a university professor to proceed to trial. While the department has secured plea deals from several scientists, in September a federal judge acquitted the first professor to face trial, University of Tennessee, Knoxville nanotechnologist Anming Hu, after concluding the prosecutors’ case against him was unpersuasive. The department is facing increasing pressure to reform its approach from scientific organizations and even a former prosecutor for the initiative, who argue its focus on nondisclosure of funding has strayed from the overarching goal of countering economic espionage by the Chinese government. While DOJ has dropped several cases involving scientists in recent months, it is pressing ahead with several others. Unrelated to Lieber’s trial, the Cato Institute is holding an event on Thursday to discuss the China Initiative’s “origins and consequences,” and on Saturday Hu is speaking about his trial at a webinar organized by the Asian American Scholar Forum, which was established in response to the initiative.
Event to Explore Ethical Risks of US-China Research Collaborations
The Hoover Institution, a conservative think tank, is holding a webinar on Wednesday to discuss ethical risks posed by research collaborations with entities in China that develop technologies with defense applications or that facilitate mass surveillance and human rights abuses. Among the panelists are contributors to recent reports published by the institution that offer frameworks for evaluating ethical and research security risks of US–China collaborations. The U.S. government has placed increasingly stringent limits on interactions with various Chinese entities deemed to be supporting the Chinese military or that are implicated in the repression of Uyghurs, most recently the AI company SenseTime and various quantum technology organizations. Separately this week, the Hudson Institute, another conservative think tank, is holding an event with Sens. Bob Casey (D-PA) and John Cornyn (R-TX) to discuss their National Critical Capabilities Defense Act, which would establish a process for blocking U.S. entities from investing in certain advanced industries in China.
Academies to Assess Methods of Anticipating Catastrophic Hazards
On Friday, the National Academies is convening a daylong workshop on “anticipating rare events of major significance.” The workshop is sponsored by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency and will review current and prospective methods of predicting both anthropogenic and natural hazards, such as pandemics and the use of weapons of mass destruction. The chair of the workshop organizing committee is Christopher Barrett, the founding executive director of the Biocomplexity Institute at the University of Virginia. The Academies is holding a second public workshop on the topic on Dec. 21 and will also hold a separate classified workshop.
|
|
In Case You Missed It
|
Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm, center, tours a carbon capture pilot project at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign’s Abbott Power Plant on Dec. 9. The university’s Prairie Research Institute developed the project with support from the Department of Energy. (Image credit – DOE) |
DOE Prepares for Influx of Demonstration Project Funding
The Department of Energy issued a request for input last week on “technologies ready to be demonstrated that reduce carbon emissions and remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.” The request responds to the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which President Biden signed into law on Nov. 15 and will provide more than $62 billion to DOE over multiple years, including about $12.5 billion for carbon management R&D, infrastructure, and technology demonstrations. DOE is casting a broad net in considering its next moves, seeking perspectives from “industry, investors, developers, academia, research laboratories, government agencies, NGOs, and potentially affected communities (including environmental justice, Tribal, energy transition, and other communities).” The department states it is interested in “the entire life cycle of these technologies, including fossil fuel supply chain considerations, future system risks, and social/institutional context.” Through the infrastructure act, DOE is also receiving $9.5 billion for hydrogen production technology and it obtained more than 200 responses to a similar request for information issued for that area last summer. Altogether, funding from the act is set to transformatively expand DOE’s technology portfolio, and the department will have to rapidly scale up its ability to select and oversee large projects. Decarbonization advocates are also watching DOE’s moves to see to what degree they subsidize fossil fuel companies, which are well-positioned to compete for full-scale carbon-management and hydrogen-production projects.
Coordinating Basic and Applied Research a Focus at BESAC Meeting
At its meeting last week, the Department of Energy’s Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee heard from a trio of representatives from “science and energy technology teams” the department is setting up to deepen coordination between its basic research and applied energy technology programs. The presentations focused on hydrogen production, long-duration energy storage, and methods of removing technology directly from the atmosphere, which are the subjects of three “Energy Earthshot” initiatives the department announced this year. DOE expects to have announced a total of between six and eight such Earthshots by later next year. Their objective is to set capability and price goals that will focus R&D efforts around the Biden administration’s decarbonization agenda. At the meeting, it was also announced that MIT physicist Marc Kastner is stepping down as BESAC chair and will be succeeded by Harvard University chemist and Kavli Foundation President Cynthia Friend. Friend co-chaired a recent BESAC study that warned the U.S. is losing its clear global leadership position in the kinds of research and facilities supported by DOE’s Basic Energy Sciences program.
Study Proposes Billions for R&D on Ocean-Based Carbon Removal
The National Academies released a report last week that outlines the feasibility and costs of scaling up six types of ocean-based methods for removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. The study recommends the U.S. spend around $2.5 billion over 10 years to further explore their viability, of which $125 million would be for foundational research relevant to all methods of ocean-based carbon dioxide removal, such as development of monitoring systems and international governance frameworks. The remainder would be distributed across the six techniques, which range from seaweed cultivation and coastal restoration efforts to artificially altering ocean chemistry to enhance carbon dioxide uptake. The committee was chaired by University of Virginia oceanographer Scott Doney and sponsored by the ClimateWorks Foundation, a climate research philanthropy. Its report builds off a 2019 Academies report that largely examined four land-based techniques.
Rosenworcel Confirmed as FCC Chair
On Dec. 7, the Senate voted 68 to 31 to confirm Jessica Rosenworcel to the Federal Communications Commission for another five-year term. Rosenworcel has been a member of the commission since 2012, and in October President Biden selected her to serve as its chair. Rosenworcel will play a central role in managing disputes over spectrum use by 5G devices and other commercial applications, which could disrupt its use by applications such as weather satellites and the Global Positioning System. At her confirmation hearing, Rosenworcel said that FCC should coordinate more effectively with the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, which represents federal users of spectrum. The nomination of Biden’s pick to lead the NTIA, Alan Davidson, is up for a vote this Wednesday by the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee.
Finalists for $1 Billion Industry Cluster Competition Named
On Dec. 13, the Commerce Department announced 60 finalists for its $1 billion Build Back Better Regional Challenge, which aims to seed “regional industry clusters” across the U.S. Each finalist will receive around $500,000 to refine their proposals for the final competition, through which the department will issue between 20 and 30 awards of up to $100 million each. Many of the proposals focus on technological innovation and a number are led by universities, including Georgia Tech, Virginia Tech, Northeastern University, the State University of New York, the University of Alabama, the University of Southern Mississippi, the University of Texas at El Paso, the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, the University of Maine, the University of Rhode Island, the University of Memphis, and Wichita State University.
|
|
Events This Week
All times are Eastern Standard Time, unless otherwise noted. Listings do not imply endorsement.
Monday, December 13
Tuesday, December 14
Wednesday, December 15
Thursday, December 16
Friday, December 17
Saturday, December 18
Monday, December 20
|
|
Opportunities USGCRP Seeking Comments on Draft Plan
The U.S. Global Change Research Program is accepting input on a draft of its strategic plan for the next decade. USGCRP is particularly seeking responses that address “ideas on emerging, large-scale scientific questions related to global change and/or response, especially those where interagency collaboration will be critical; specific information on how science is or is not being used to inform societal response to climate change, and why; and knowledge gaps and obstacles to implementing scientific tools or knowledge.” Submissions are due Jan. 11, 2022.
STPI Hiring S&T Policy Fellows
The Science and Technology Policy Institute is seeking candidates for its two-year fellowship program. Fellows work as research assistants on projects that provide independent analysis to the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and other federal science agencies. Individuals who have received a bachelor’s degree in a STEM field between May 2020 and July 2022 are eligible to apply. Applications are due Jan. 18, 2022.
NASA Hiring Earth Science Division Deputy Director
NASA’s Science Mission Directorate is accepting applications for the deputy director of its Earth Science Division, which oversees a $2.3 billion portfolio of investments in satellites, research, and technology development. Applications are due Jan. 3, 2022.
Know of an upcoming science policy event either inside or outside the Beltway? Email us at fyi@aip.org.
|
|
Around the Web
News and views currently in circulation. Links do not imply endorsement.
White House
Congress
Science, Society, and the Economy
- China will soon lead the US in tech (Wall Street Journal, perspective by Graham Allison and Eric Schmidt)
- How America can keep its lead in technology (Wall Street Journal, perspectives by David Goldman and Paul Dabbar)
- Industry demand drives innovation (Nature)
- Elon Musk is Time’s Person of the Year (Time)
- Elon Musk’s diatribe against subsidies ignores the history of the tech industry (Washington Post, perspective by Fareed Zakaria)
- Taking steps to further bolster chip industry’s commitment to ethics (Semiconductor Industry Association)
- Introducing the Kavli Centers for Ethics, Science, and the Public (Kavli Foundation)
- How ‘science’ went woke (Daily Signal, perspective by Jarrett Stepman)
- California’s proposed woke math curriculum alarms mathematicians, scientists (Fox News)
- PandemIcons? The medical scientist as iconic figure in times of crisis (Configurations, paper by Martin Butler, et al.)
- A new film about a killer comet revives memories of a nail-biting night in the Times newsroom two decades ago (New York Times, perspective by Dennis Overbye)
- AGU welcomes first cohort of Local Science Partners (AGU)
Education and Workforce
- NIH updates policy manual on harassment, discrimination (NIH)
- ‘Everyone knew!’ Problems with UW-Madison prof who led ‘toxic’ lab persisted for two decades (Wisconsin State Journal)
- Women scientists described a culture of sexual misconduct at the Smithsonian’s Tropical Research Institute (BuzzFeed News)
- Once shunned in Antarctica, female scientists are now doing crucial polar research (Scientific American, perspective by Naomi Oreskes)
- Actions needed by higher education institutions, technology companies, federal agencies to increase representation of women of color in tech (National Academies, report)
- How retention, not just recruitment, hinders STEM diversity (Inside Higher Ed)
- Southeast Asians are underrepresented in STEM, but still boxed out (NPR)
- Making science education a national priority (NSTA)
- Protecting freedom of expression at MIT (MIT Faculty Newsletter)
- ‘A chilling, hostile environment’: Faculty protest China Initiative as tensions continue to disrupt research (Yale Daily News)
- US trade and immigration policies toward China have backfired (Forbes, perspective by Stuart Anderson)
Research Management
- Research outliers among universities under 50 (Nature)
- Ever since FDR’s tenure, the US government has periodically questioned, and then affirmed, its hands-off approach to American universities. China’s rise changed all that (The Wire China)
- Is MIT’s research helping the Chinese military? (Wall Street Journal, perspective by Michelle Bethel)
- AIP Publishing to launch two fully open access journals in 2022 (AIP)
- What can we learn from one million open access articles? (Scholarly Kitchen, perspective by Steven Inchoombe)
- European Commission makes software available to all to benefit businesses, innovators and areas of public interest (European Commission)
- Call to join the decentralized science movement (Nature, perspective by Sarah Hamburg)
- Science societies launch Community Science Knowledge Exchange forum and the journal Community Science (AGU)
- NIH needs to take further actions to resolve cybersecurity control deficiencies and improve its program (GAO, report)
- Improving compliance with NSF project reporting requirements (NSF)
- Research infrastructure guide (NSF, report)
- Non-mandatory risk management guide for program and project management for acquisition of capital assets (DOE)
- The Embedded Entrepreneurship Initiative (DARPA, audio)
Labs and Facilities
Computing and Communications
Space
Weather, Climate, and Environment
Energy
Defense
Biomedical
International Affairs
- The UN must get on with appointing its new science board (Nature, editorial)
- Unpacking the geopolitics of technology (Atlantic Council, report)
- The great tech rivalry: China vs. the US in the 21st century (Harvard Belfer Center, report)
- The US and China should compete on green technology (New York Times, perspective by Deborah Seligsohn)
- CNAS launches new set of research projects on US and allied economic and technological competition with China (CNAS)
- Despite its science and tech priorities, China is suffering from a shortage of high-skilled labor that seems to be worsening (The Wire China)
- Call for additional €4 billion investment in European research infrastructures (Science|Business)
- Georgia joins Horizon Europe, EU’s research and innovation programme (European Commission)
- Commission to push for European degrees as part of new universities strategy (Science|Business)
- EU may face shortage of key materials for diagnostics, cancer treatments (Reuters)
- Britain increases scrutiny of foreign takeovers as US deals surge (Wall Street Journal)
- What would an Australian DARPA actually do? (ASPI, perspective by Graeme Dunk and James Kruger)
- AUKUS is a ‘minilateral’ technology accelerator (ASPI, report)
- South Korea has long wanted nuclear subs. A new reactor could open a door (New York Times)
- South Korea and the nexus between science and diplomacy (Science Diplomacy, interview with Ambassador Lee Soo-hyuck)
|
|
|
|
|
|