
View of the U.S. Capitol building during the coronavirus pandemic.
(Image credit – Patrick Pho / Flickr, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)
View of the U.S. Capitol building during the coronavirus pandemic.
(Image credit – Patrick Pho / Flickr, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)
After passing a roughly $2 trillion pandemic response package last month, Congress is already moving on to the next steps of its response. It is currently completing work
While last month’s package included emergency funding
Colleges and universities are beginning to receive
Making the case for direct research relief, a coalition of four major U.S. university associations sent a letter
“Given the current shutdown of many university-based and national laboratories due to the pandemic, we are deeply concerned that the people who comprise the research workforce — graduate students, postdocs, principal investigators, and technical support staff — and the future health and strength of the U.S. research enterprise, are at risk,” the letter states.
The recommended funding supplement is double the request
The associations also ask Congress to “urge or require” science agencies to issue uniform policies that provide flexibility in how grant and contract funds can be used to support research personnel during the pandemic. They state that not all agencies have taken advantage of such grant flexibilities provided by the White House Office of Management and Budget in a March 19 memorandum
Aside from proposing direct support for research, a broader set of higher education associations has also asked Congress to bolster the education sector with a separate $46 billion in emergency funding
In early April, the House Science Committee solicited input from stakeholders in the research community concerning needs within its jurisdiction
APS calls for agencies to “immediately provide guidance to program managers to relax grant submission deadlines,” stating there are many cases of deadlines not being extended for programs at the Department of Energy and National Science Foundation. The society further expresses appreciation for the White House allowing grant funds to be used to maintain pay for researchers and graduate students while labs are shut down and asks for full or partial extensions of grant costs to enable projects to finish with revised end dates.
APS also suggests that funding for the Research Experiences for Undergraduates program be substantially increased in 2021 to make up for lost opportunities this summer and that domestic scholarship programs be enhanced to address an expected near-term decrease in international student enrollment. Highlighting how the pandemic has led many international students to return to their home countries due to institutional closures in the U.S., APS asks that resources be allocated to processing the backlog of pending visa renewals and new nonimmigrant visas.
“While outside the Science Committee’s jurisdiction, ensuring international students and researchers can return to their institutions and labs in a timely manner is a top priority for APS,” the letter states, adding, “International scientists make up a significant segment of our STEM workforce, and a return to our pre-pandemic research capabilities will require the prompt return of international students and scientists to the U.S.”
Several other societies that responded to the committee drew attention to similar funding and workforce needs, while also making other discipline-specific requests. For instance, the American Chemical Society proposed
Among the recommendations
Coalitions of societies have also outlined options for investment in “shovel ready” research infrastructure. For instance, the Coalition for National Science Funding, which advocates for NSF, suggested in its proposal