
Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chair Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) urges her colleagues to advance the American Energy Innovation Act, a bill she has worked on over the past year.
(Image credit – U.S. Senate)
Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chair Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) urges her colleagues to advance the American Energy Innovation Act, a bill she has worked on over the past year.
(Image credit – U.S. Senate)
A sweeping energy innovation policy bill that the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee developed over the past year hit a roadblock on March 9 when it failed to advance on the Senate floor. Under chamber rules, the measure required 60 votes to proceed toward a final vote, but it secured
The bill’s sponsors, Committee Chair Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and Ranking Member Joe Manchin (D-WV), had anticipated it would move swiftly when they unveiled
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has left the door open for a future attempt to advance the legislation, but it is unclear
Titled the American Energy Innovation Act, Murkowski and Manchin’s legislation consolidates dozens of bills that they advanced out of committee over the last year. In her push to bring the bill to the finish line, Murkowski has framed it as an essential modernization of U.S. energy policy. Congress has not passed such a broad update since the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007
Among its numerous provisions, the new bill would modify policy for most of the Department of Energy’s applied R&D programs. It would, for instance, require the department to support demonstrations of advanced nuclear reactors, place a new emphasis on marine energy, and expand efforts in geothermal energy.
The bill would also direct DOE to create a dedicated research, development, and deployment program for energy storage technologies, and require the department to support energy storage system demonstrations. It would further establish a joint DOE-Department of Defense technology demonstration program geared specifically toward long-duration energy storage.
DOE’s fossil energy R&D program would be modified significantly under the bill, with an increased focus on carbon capture, storage, and utilization technologies and a new R&D program on capturing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Manchin, whose state is heavily invested in fossil energy, has argued
Beyond energy production, the bill contains a number of provisions focused on industry, including ones establishing DOE-led technology development and technical assistance programs for reducing industrial greenhouse gas emissions. Other provisions in the bill focus on issues such as energy efficiency, the security and modernization of the electric grid, “smart” manufacturing, workforce development, and mineral security.
Despite the bill’s focus on clean energy and energy efficiency, Murkowski and Manchin are not emphasizing its relevance to climate policy as much as they did when they kicked off
“What is important for members to know is this package without question is a good step, is a strong step, a necessary step in the right direction to continue to reduce our nation’s greenhouse gas emissions. … To say that perhaps we should not pass a good bill because it doesn’t go far enough, in my view, is a mistake. That will result in absolutely nothing happening.”
During floor debate, senators flocked to attach amendments to the bill, such as
The measure, sponsored
Reacting to Senate leaders’ refusal to hold a vote on the amendment, Kennedy retaliated by blocking action on all other amendments. “This isn’t about the bill anymore to me. This is about honor and respecting your colleagues,” he told
Following the vote, Murkowski declared
In 2016, Murkowski nearly succeeded
Meanwhile, the House Science Committee is continuing to develop its own
Although the committee has reached bipartisan agreement on some of its bills, such as the ARPA–E measure and a geothermal R&D bill
Committee Democrats and Republicans have expressed interest in working to reconcile their respective agendas, but doing so could take some time. Adam Rosenberg, a member of the committee’s Democratic staff, said last month